Compare Page

Uniqueness

Characteristic Name: Uniqueness
Dimension: Consistency
Description: The data is uniquely identifiable
Granularity: Record
Implementation Type: Rule-based approach
Characteristic Type: Declarative

Verification Metric:

The number of duplicate records reported per thousand records

GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons

The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation

Guidelines: Scenario:
Ensure that every entity(record) is unique by implementing a key in every relation (1) Key constraint
Ensure that same entity is not recorded twice under different unique identifiers (1) Same customer is entered under different customer ID
Ensure that unique key is not-null at any cost (1) Employee ID which is the key of employee table is not null at any cost
In case of using bar codes standardise the bar code generation process to ensure that Bar codes are not reused (1) UPC

Validation Metric:

How mature is the creation and implementation of the DQ rules to maintain uniqueness of data records

These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.

Example: Source:
A school has 120 current students and 380 former students (i.e. 500 in total) however; the Student database shows 520 different student records. This could include Fred Smith and Freddy Smith as separate records, despite there only being one student at the school named Fred Smith. This indicates a uniqueness of 500/520 x 100 = 96.2% N. Askham, et al., “The Six Primary Dimensions for Data Quality Assessment: Defining Data Quality Dimensions”, DAMA UK Working Group, 2013.
duplicate vendor records with the same name and different addresses make it difficult to ensure that payment is sent to the correct address. When purchases by one company are associated with duplicate master records, the credit limit for that company can unknowingly be exceeded. This can expose the business to unnecessary credit risks. D. McGilvray, “Executing Data Quality Projects: Ten Steps to Quality Data and Trusted Information”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2008.
on two maps of the same date. Since events have a duration, this idea can be extended to identify events that exhibit temporal overlap. H. Veregin, “Data Quality Parameters” in P. A. Longley, M. F. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, and D. W. Rhind (eds) Geographical Information Systems: Volume 1, Principles and Technical Issues. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1999, pp. 177-89.
The patient’s identification details are correct and uniquely identify the patient. P. J. Watson, “Improving Data Quality: A Guide for Developing Countries”, World Health Organization, 2003.

The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.

Definition: Source:
The entity is unique — there are no duplicate values. B. BYRNE, J. K., D. MCCARTY, G. SAUTER, H. SMITH, P WORCESTER 2008. The information perspective of SOA design Part 6:The value of applying the data quality analysis pattern in SOA. IBM corporation.
Asserting uniqueness of the entities within a data set implies that no entity exists more than once within the data set and that there is a key that can be used to uniquely access each entity. For example, in a master product table, each product must appear once and be assigned a unique identifier that represents that product across the client applications. LOSHIN, D. 2006. Monitoring Data quality Performance using Data Quality Metrics. Informatica Corporation.
Each real-world phenomenon is either represented by at most one identifiable data unit or by multiple but consistent identifiable units or by multiple identifiable units whose inconsistencies are resolved within an acceptable time frame. PRICE, R. J. & SHANKS, G. Empirical refinement of a semiotic information quality framework. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2005. IEEE, 216a-216a.

 

Value consistency

Characteristic Name: Value consistency
Dimension: Consistency
Description: Data values are consistent and do not provide conflicting or heterogeneous instances
Granularity: Element
Implementation Type: Rule-based approach
Characteristic Type: Declarative

Verification Metric:

The number of inconsistent data values reported in an attribute per thousand records

GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons

The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation

Guidelines: Scenario:
For critical data elements provide standard classifications (values lists) for data entry interfaces and restrict arbitrary values across the system (1) Country, city are taken from a standard list.
(2) Generally accepted industry classifications are used to analyse customers industry wise (Education, Banking & Finance, Medical, Manufacturing…….
When data elements are combined for specific identification/management/accounting purposes, standardise such combinations and use them across the system. (1) Customer and sales order are combined for identification purposes
(2) Costs of wastage are associated with individual orders they are incurred and managed.
Define data attributes in such a way that data values are atomic and hence consistency can be maintained for any form of aggregation or consolidation Name is divided into first name Middle name and Last Name
Maintain consistency in using unit of measures across different tables and different data bases Sales price is in $ in Sales table and Accounts receivable ledger

Validation Metric:

How mature is the creation and implementation of the DQ rules to maintain value consistency

These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.

Example: Source:
School admin: a student’s date of birth has the same value and format in the school register as that stored within the Student database. N. Askham, et al., “The Six Primary Dimensions for Data Quality Assessment: Defining Data Quality Dimensions”, DAMA UK Working Group, 2013.
For example, data are inconsistent when it is documented that a male patient has had a hysterectomy. B. Cassidy, et al., “Practice Brief: Data Quality Management Model” in Journal of AHIMA, 1998, 69(6).
the name of the city and the postal code should be consistent. This can be enabled by entering just the postal code and filling in the name of the city systematically through the use of referential integrity with a postal code table Y. Lee, et al., “Journey to Data Quality”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006.
the data values ST Louis and Saint Louis may both refer to the same city. However, the recordings are inconsistent, and thus at least one of them is inaccurate. J. E. Olson, “Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 9 January 2003.

The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.

Definition: Source:
Domain Level: The data values persist from a particular data element of the data source to another data element in a second data source. Consistency can also reflect the regular use of standardized values, articularly in descriptive elements. Entity Level: The entity’s domains and domain values either persist intact or can be logically linked from one data source to another data source. Consistency can also reflect the regular use of standardized values particularly in descriptive domains. B. BYRNE, J. K., D. MCCARTY, G. SAUTER, H. SMITH, P WORCESTER 2008. The information perspective of SOA design Part 6:The value of applying the data quality analysis pattern in SOA. IBM corporation.
Determines the extent to which distinct data instances provide nonconflicting information about the same underlying data object. For example, the salary range for level 4 employees must be between $40,000 and $65,000. G. GATLING, C. B., R. CHAMPLIN, H. STEFANI, G. WEIGEL 2007. Enterprise Information Management with SAP, Boston, Galileo Press Inc.
Data is consistent if it doesn’t convey heterogeneity, neither in contents nor in form – anti examples: Order.Payment. Type = ‘Check’; Order. Payment. CreditCard_Nr = 4252… (inconsistency in contents); Order.requested_by: ‘European Central Bank’;Order.delivered_to: ‘ECB’ (inconsistency in form,because in the first case the customer is identified by the full name, while in the second case the customer’s acronym is used). KIMBALL, R. & CASERTA, J. 2004. The data warehouse ETL toolkit: practical techniques for extracting. Cleaning, Conforming, and Delivering, Digitized Format, originally published.
Consistency can be curiously simple or dangerously complex. In its most basic form, consistency refers to data values in one data set being consistent with values in another data set. Two data values drawn from separate data sets may be consistent with each other, yet both can be incorrect. LOSHIN, D. 2001. Enterprise knowledge management: The data quality approach, Morgan Kaufmann Pub.
In its most basic form, consistency refers to data values in one data set being consistent with values in another data set. A strict definition of consistency specifies that two data values drawn from separate data sets must not conflict with each other, although consistency does not necessarily imply correctness. LOSHIN, D. 2006. Monitoring Data quality Performance using Data Quality Metrics. Informatica Corporation.
Consistency, in popular usage, means that two or more things do not conflict with one another. This usage extends reasonably well to data values, although a bit of added discipline is desired. REDMAN, T. C. 1997. Data quality for the information age, Artech House, Inc.